Yes sir those poor mujahadin! It’s so nice of ‘The nose on your face’ to produce this little add for Mohammad condoms as they are always thinking of what’s best for those ‘victim’ Muslims.
Let’s hope there’s lots more useful advice to come!
This is important advice to as in 2001 ‘two Jordanian soldiers were evacuated home with injured penises after attempting sexual intercourse with goats.’ They were part of the UN peacekeeping force in East Timor
(UN acts to stamp out sex abuse by staff in East Timor).
Well, what can you expect! In Islam the female body is grossly shameful/offensive and females are polluting devils who must be covered head-to-toe to hide their shame and are segregated from pure men. There is no chance of any sort of equal friendship or loving relationship with a female, so naturally the goats (sheep, cows, camels..) start to look good!! And apparently this ‘taste’ for goats remains even when on overseas duty! After all, the goat isn’t covered head-to-toe so they must be less offensive than a female!
Muslims will now start ranting that Islam forbids sex with animals and indeed there is some text that says such people incur allah’s anger or won’t make it to paradise if they have sex, particularly anal sex with animals BUT there’s also this text where one suggests such acts be punished and the other says NO punishment??? Is NO punishment really an ‘OK’ or ‘let’s just ignore it’?? After all, Islam dictates everything and relies on the fear of punishment to make people behave and, because ‘morality’ is simply you can do anything Mohammad did, said was OK, allowed his followers to do or failed to forbid (and that includes a lot of things we would find utterly immoral!!), the Muslim is in a state of confusion. If there’s no punishment is it OK? Which bit is correct? ( LINK)
*Abu-Dawud Book 38, Number 4449: Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal? He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
*Abu-Dawud Book 38, Number 4450: Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is NO prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
After all, if normal sexual outlets are denied (including masturbation by your own hand which is unlawful and also denies you paradise–it’s only OK if done by your wife or slave/concubine – Reliance of the Traveller w37.1 p932. Note, it is offensive for either husband or wife to look at the other’s genitals m2.4 p 512), what’s left?
Abul Kasem In his article ‘Sex and sexuality in Islam’ re Bestiality (reference) notes the “huge difference in opinion among the Islamic jurists regarding the nature of punishment to be meted out for bestiality.
The punishment for the perpetrator of this act varies from no punishment to the killing of the accused......... Also, note that the beast always receives the punishment (slaughtering) even though it never commits the crime.” He refers to various legal groups where ‘punishment’ varies from Ta’zir or disciplinary action such as verbal reprimand, or limited beating or jail and possibly compensation to the animal’s owner for its death while others apply hadd or prescribed legal penalty-death. As for the animal, it can be killed and burnt (shielding the perpetrator from disgrace if the animal remained alive) though some claim it can be eaten - others say not!
Further problems come from the claimed sayings of the Ayatollah Khomeini from Khomeini’s Tahrirolvasyleh or Tahrir-ul-Vasyleh which according to one site is “one of Khomeini's major works and is studied in detail by the Akhoonds” It was written in Arabic. “ Tahrirolvasyleh is an Iranicised version of its Arabic title 'Tahrir al Wasilah', Khomeini's ramblings on fiqh (Islamic Jurisprudence). It comes in two volumes and was written by Khomeini whilst he was in Turkey. Not only does this literary masterpiece exist, but we have a downloadable version for your viewing pleasure. Tahrir.zip ” ( and HERE) Khomeini was considered a great Islamic scholar and led the Islamic revolution in Iran so they can all now live in a lovely Islamic paradise.
I present various translations here as there is some confusion between there being 2 volumes and 4 editions or it being now produced in 4 volumes, plus there are problems with the translations from the Arabic. I don’t own these books so must rely on the internet and leave the reader to come to their own conclusions........
From the Tahrirolvasyleh we get instructions on how a man can get pleasure from a tiny child, including the requirement that he provide for her if he damages her by intercourse (she isn’t considered one of his wives) and cannot marry her sister plus (LINK) the view that while wine is impure, opium and hashish are not, and some comments on sodomy and sex with animals. (reference)
Apparently the Dr. Homa Darabi Foundation, reports:
"If one commits an act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned, and the price of it paid to its owner by him who sodomized it."
And the Persian text of these sayings can be found in "Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom" (reference)
Others, including Islamic sites provide this translation from Tahrir al wasile (Tahrir-ul-Vasyleh):
22-One of things which will cause an animal to be Haram, although it was originally Halal, is a human having sex with it and ... because of this work (sodomizing the animal) its meat and the meat of its lamb which will be born after sodomizing will all be Haram, along with its milk, wool, and hair.
23- If the animal which someone had sex with is an edible animal like a sheep, cow, or camel it should be killed (Zebh) and burned. If it is one of the animals which is not usually eaten but is used for riding and transportation, like a horse or donkey, it should be taken out of the city and sold in another city. (ref.1) or (ref.2) (The book of eatables and drinkables: saying about animals, number 22, 23 ).
Well it’s certainly bad news for the animal thanks mainly to Islam’s disgusting, absurd food fetishes!!
What’s the point of it all? Well, mainly to show the great add for Mohammad condoms but also to illustrate the absurdity of Islam where reason doesn’t apply and behaviour and punishments are dictated by archaic text that can have serious consequences.
Those goat loving Jordanians could have faced death for their act had they been in a society ruled by religious leaders that adhered to the idea that sex with animals was ‘adultery’ or similar requiring death! Some may think Islam is admirable because it sets crimes and punishments eg steal and lose a body part (hand, foot) etc but not only are punishments often barbaric but many acts that a modern civilised society would regard as serious crimes aren’t ‘punished’ at all eg sex with prepubescent girls, beating women, slavery and sex with slaves while other trivial things are viciously punished under Islam eg girls hung in Iran for ‘crimes against their chastity!!’ So, let’s ensure no sharia in Australia so we can continue to evolve into a humane, worthy society, not sink back into the rigid, vile dictates, fear and punishments of 7th century Arab society with all its perversion and sadism.
Al-Misri, Ahmad ibn Naqib; Reliance of the Traveler: A classic manual of Islamic sacred law. In Arabic with facing English Text, commentary and appendices edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller amana publications Maryland USA 1994